Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Baudoin v. Louisiana Power & Light Co.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided March 15, 1989No. 87-CA-585Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partBowes, Judge

I concur with the majority that a fired employee can proceed with a defamation suit in a state court without first going through a grievance procedure. However, I respectfully dissent from that portion of the opinion which holds that the letter written by an Ebasco Services supervisor was defamatory and not protected by a qualified privilege.

In order to maintain an action in defamation, the following elements must be established: 1) defamatory words; 2) publication; 3) falsity; 4) malice, actual or implied; and 5) resulting injury. Cangelosi v. Schwegmann Bros., Etc., 390 So.2d 196 (La.1980);…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Cangelosi v. SCHWEGMANN BROS., ETC.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1980
  2. Carter v. Catfish CabinLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1975
  3. Brown v. News-World Publishing Corp.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1971
  4. Weatherall v. Department of Health and Human ResourcesLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1983
  5. Otero v. EwingSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1926

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API