Baudoin v. Louisiana Power & Light Co.
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partBowes, Judge
I concur with the majority that a fired employee can proceed with a defamation suit in a state court without first going through a grievance procedure. However, I respectfully dissent from that portion of the opinion which holds that the letter written by an Ebasco Services supervisor was defamatory and not protected by a qualified privilege.
In order to maintain an action in defamation, the following elements must be established: 1) defamatory words; 2) publication; 3) falsity; 4) malice, actual or implied; and 5) resulting injury. Cangelosi v. Schwegmann Bros., Etc., 390 So.2d 196 (La.1980);…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Cangelosi v. SCHWEGMANN BROS., ETC.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1980
- Carter v. Catfish CabinLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1975
- Brown v. News-World Publishing Corp.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1971
- Weatherall v. Department of Health and Human ResourcesLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1983
- Otero v. EwingSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1926
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.