Perry v. Golub
District Court, N.D. Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW ON PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION HEARING
GUIN, District Judge.
The plaintiff’s motion for a preliminary injunction was heard by the Court on August 29, 1975 following notice to all parties. Subject matter jurisdiction, personal jurisdiction over defendants, and venue are not contested. The Court has jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1343.
I
FINDINGS OF FACT
Based on the testimony of the witnesses and the exhibits introduced at the hearing, the Court finds that the plaintiff has shown through the evidence that the standards required for preliminary injunctive relief…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
- The Canal Authority of the State of Florida v. Howard H. Callaway, Secretary of the United States Army, the Cross-Florida Canal Association v. Howard H. Callaway, Secretary of the United States Army, Eleanor H. Miller v. Avery S. Fullerton, Environmental Defense Fund, Inc. v. Corps of Engineers of the United States Army, J. G. Perko v. The Canal Authority of the State of Florida, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
- Sabala v. Western Gillette, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
3Cited by16 opinions
- Joseph C. Spagnola, Jr. v. William Mathis, (Two Cases) Joseph C. Spagnola, Jr. v. William MathisCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
- Carl J. Mollnow v. Paul K. CarltonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- Pope v. BondDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1986
- Alvarez v. WilsonDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1977
- Stith v. BarnwellDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1978
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.