Legal Opinion
Goldberg v. Sitomer, Sitomer & Porges
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 29, 1983PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Silverman, J.
These are appeals from orders of the Supreme Court, Special Term, denying defendants’ motions to dismiss the complaint on the grounds of Statute of Limitations and failure to state a cause of action.
Plaintiff, a lawyer, alleges that he was employed as an associate by the law firm of the defendants Sitomer, Sitomer and Forges; that in the course of his work he was called upon to participate in the preparation of a registration statement for filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission on behalf of the corporate defendant Empire, a client of the firm; that…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Brick v. Cohn-Hall-Marx Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1937
- Morrison v. National Broadcasting Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1967
- Holst v. EdingerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Seligson v. Chase Manhattan BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
3Cited by18 opinions
- Trott v. Merit Department StoreAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- Boisjoly v. Morton Thiokol, Inc.District Court, D. Utah · 1988
- State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. LiMauroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Katz v. TravelersDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2017
- Bobal v. Rensselaer Polytechnic InstituteCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.