Legal Opinion

Higgins v. Ausmuss

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided April 15, 1883PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from Linn Circuit Court. — Hon. G. X). Burgess Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtNorton, J.

This is an action in the nature of replevin,' for claim and delivery of personal property, instituted before a justice of the peace of Linn county. Plaintiff obtained judgment before the justice, and also in the circuit court, to which the cause had been taken on defendant’s appeal, and from the latter judgment defendant has appealed to this court, and assigns as the chief ground of error the action of the court in refusing instructions.

It appears from the record before us that defendant was the collector of the corporation of the city of Linneus, and was charged by an ordinance' of said city…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. City of St. Louis ex rel. Seibert v. AllenSupreme Court of Missouri · 1873
  2. City of Louisiana v. MillerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1877
  3. Henry v. BellSupreme Court of Missouri · 1881

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Board of Commissioners v. AbbottSupreme Court of Kansas · 1893
  2. City of Raleigh v. PeaceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1892
  3. City of Clinton ex rel. Thornton v. Henry CountySupreme Court of Missouri · 1893
  4. Simons v. WittmannMissouri Court of Appeals · 1905
  5. Barber Asphalt Paving Co. v. City of St. JosephSupreme Court of Missouri · 1904

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API