Legal Opinion

Fibre Yarn Co. v. Tiberio

Pennylvania Municipal Court, Philadelphia County

Decided June 29, 1922No. 236Published

Rule on garnishee for judgment for want of sufficient answer. Municipal Court, Phila. Co., March T., 1922, No. 236.

1Opinion of the Court

Lewis, J.,

On April 8, 1922, the plaintiff recovered judgment against Emil Tiberio, trading as the Ideal Hand Embroidery Company, in the sum of $357.08.

On May 17, 1922, an attachment sur judgment was issued and Joseph Saracenyi was summoned as garnishee.

On the same date interrogatories were filed to the garnishee, who in his answers, among other things, stated that on Oct. 18, 1921, he “bought the Ideal Hand Embroidery Company’s business from the defendant,” and that he “bought said business on the above date and paid the full consideration therefor, receiving a bill of sale from the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Smith v. BlachleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1901
  2. Ritter v. WraySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1911

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API