Legal Opinion
Bolin v. State
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided June 20, 1957No. 6 Div. 288PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SIMPSON, Justice.
Response to question certified by the Court of Appeals.
The appellant was tried and convicted under Count 2 of an indictment charging that he “did have in his possession for the purpose of making, producing or manufacturing a stink bomb, or a substitute or device therefor, to-wit, three fourths of a
liquid ounce of ethyl mercaptan, one of the ingredients necessary or commonly used in making, producing or manufacturing such stink bomb or substitute or device therefor, against the peace and dignity of the State of Alabama.”
This indictment was drawn under § 369, Title 14, Code of…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Lanzetta v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Noble State Bank v. HaskellSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Bailey v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Camfield v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Southern Express Co. v. WhittleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1915
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Moore v. Mobile Infirmary Ass'nSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991
- McMurphy v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1984
- Thompson v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1985
- Ross Neely Exp., Inc. v. ALA. DEPT. OF ENVIRON. MANAGEMENTSupreme Court of Alabama · 1983
- Hattie Mae Ricks and Joseph N. Williams v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1968
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.