Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Renaud

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided February 7, 2012No. 11-P-382PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKatzmann, J.

Identification cards are common currency of everyday life. They are also portable objects that can be lost, stolen, or transplanted by others. The instant appeal arises in that context. After a jury-waived trial in District Court, a judge found the defendant guilty of malicious destruction of property, breaking and entering in the daytime, and larceny over $250. The defendant argues on appeal that the judge erred in denying his motion for a required finding of not guilty made at the close of the Commonwealth’s evidence. He contends that an identification card found at the scene of the crime…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. LatimoreMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
  2. Commonwealth v. KelleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
  3. Commonwealth v. StuckichMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2008
  4. Commonwealth v. KelleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1971
  5. Commonwealth v. BerryMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2000

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Renaud v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2015
  2. Commonwealth v. AnitusMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2018
  3. Commonwealth v. OrtizMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2026
  4. Commonwealth v. RiveraMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2017
  5. Commonwealth v. SpenceMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API