Fong Choi Yu v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Per curiam
Petitioner seeks review of a decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals denying suspension of petitioner’s deportation, pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1254(a) (D-
No abuse of discretion in denying suspension appears on the record. Proof of a petitioner’s eligibility for suspension does not compel the granting of that relief. (United States ex rel. Hintopoulos v. Shaughnessy (1957) 353 U.S. 72, 77 S.Ct. 618, 1 L.Ed.2d 652; MacKay v. McAlexander (9th Cir. 1959) 268 F.2d 35, 40.) That petitioner would suffer economic hardship from deportation is insufficient to require an exercise of the Board’s…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- United States Ex Rel. Hintopoulos v. ShaughnessySupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Hamish Scott MacKay Apellant v. Eugene D. McAlexander Acting District Director, District 31, Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1959
3Cited by12 opinions
- Kishin Ramchand Balani v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1982
- Khapabhai Dahyabhai Patel and Pramilaben Khapabhai Patel v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- Jong Ha Wang and Kyung Hwa Wang v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Dong Hyung Lee v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- Cecelia Pelaez v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.