Legal Opinion

People ex rel. Ryan v. Russell

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 2, 1866PublishedCited by 3 opinions

APPLICATION for a mandamus directing the city judge of New York to allow a writ of habeas corpus in hehalf ' of Michael Byan,

1Opinion of the CourtBy the Courts Geo. G. Babnabd, J.

The city judge of . the city of New York, by the act creating the- office, was clothed with all the judicial powers vested by law in the recorder of the city, (Laws of 1850, chap. 205, § 3,) and was directed, by the same section, to perform and discharge all judicial duties imposed upon such recorder concurrently with him. The recorder is by statute vested with the powers of a Supreme Court commissioner. (2 R. S. 281, § 35.) As such he has power to allow a writ of habeas corpus returnable before himself, and take such proceedings, upon a'return to the writ, as are authorized by the statute…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Yates v. LansingNew York Supreme Court · 1810

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Wetzler v. FitchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1878
  2. Ellis v. DabollMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
  3. State ex rel. Horsch v. Judge Civil District CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1881

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API