Legal Opinion

Moore v. Bloomingdale

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided December 8, 1910PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from Municipal Court, Borough of Manhattan, Ninth .District. Action by Annie Mackin Moore against Samuel J. Bloomingdale and others. From a judgment for defendants, plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtGavegan, J.

This action was brought under section 65 of chapter 45 of th$ Laws of 1909, known as chapter 41 of the Consolidated Laws, to recover the sum of $216 paid by the plaintiff upon a piano under a contract which provided that title to the same should remain in the defendants until the sum of $250 was paid, when a bill of sale would be delivered to plaintiff.

It was conceded upon the trial that the contract of which the above is the substance was made; that in pursuance of the terms thereof the sum of $216 was paid; that by reason of plaintiff’s default in the payment of installments the defendants…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Kneettle v. . NewcombNew York Court of Appeals · 1860
  2. Roach v. . CurtisNew York Court of Appeals · 1908
  3. White v. A. W. Gray's SonsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1904
  4. Roach v. CurtisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906
  5. Hoffman v. White Sewing Machine Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Plumiera v. BrickaNew York Supreme Court · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API