Legal Opinion
Drotar v. 60 Sweet Thing, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided May 2, 2013PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Carol R. Edmead, J.), entered July 19, 2012, which denied defendants Vic’s Hole in One, LLC and Vic’s Lucky Number Nine, LLC’s (Vic’s) motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and all cross claims as against them, and on their cross claim for contractual indemnification against 60 Sweet Thing, Inc., denied their motion to strike defendant 60 Sweet Thing, Inc.’s (60 Sweet) pleadings as a sanction for spoliation, and denied 60 Sweet’s cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint as against it, unanimously modified, on the law, to…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Johnson v. Urena Service CenterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Babich v. R.G.T. Restaurant Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Kittay v. MoskowitzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Centeno v. Regine's Originals, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
3Cited by6 opinions
- Podel v. Glimmer Five, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Wayman v. Roy Stanley, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- DiMarzo v. Jones Lang LaSalle Americas Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- Podel v. Glimmer Five, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Wayman v. Roy Stanley, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.