Legal Opinion

Callanan v. Callanan

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 13, 1933No. 29,371PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

The plaintiff is the brother of the deceased husband of the defendant. On July 7, 1932, he brought action to recover the siim of $689.85 upon the promissory note of the defendant given February 21, 1931, due in one year. This had been renewed several times.

On June 14, 1932, he filed an affidavit of attachment upon the following grounds:

“That the defendant has assigned, secreted and disposed of a part of her property with intent to delay and defraud her creditors, and that the defendant is about to assign, secrete and dispose of the rest of her property with intent to delay and defraud her…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Reiling v. WoodSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API