Goldstein v. Guedalia
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal by the plaintiff, Mary L. Goldstein, from a judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the defendants, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of New York on the 22d day of December, 1896, upon the decision of the court rendered after a trial at the New York Special Term dismissing the plaintiff’s complaint upon the merits.
1Per curiam
The decision which was filed in this case contained no separate statement of facts and conclusions of law, but was a short decision, as permitted by section 1022 of the Code of Civil Procedure. Ho exceptions were filed to it, as required by that section. We have recently held that where such is the case the court has no power to review either the decision of the court or any exceptions táken during the progress of the trial. (Thompson v. Schwartz, 39 App. Div. 658; Van Vleck v. Ballou, post, p. 489.)
The judgment, therefore, must be affirmed, with costs.
' Present—Van Brunt, P. J., Barrett,…
2Cited by1 opinion
- National Protective Ass'n of Steam Fitters & Helpers v. CummingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900