Beadall v. Moore
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal by the plaintiffs, Charles Beadall and another, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, made at the New York Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of .New York on the 25th day of July, 1921, as denies plaintiffs’ motion for judgment on the pleadings, as to the first cause of action set out in plaintiffs’ complaint.
1Opinion of the Court
Page, J.:
The complaint alleges two causes of action. The answer was interposed only to the first cause of action. Both parties moved for judgment on the pleadings. The court denied the defendant’s motion and granted plaintiffs’ motion for judgment upon the second cause of action, but denied plaintiffs’ motion upon the first cause of action.
The first cause of action is to recover upon two written instruments as follows:
“ George G. Moore :
“ London, Nov. 16, 1919.
“ Pay A. Marx & Co. or order Nine hundred and fifteen pounds (£915). GEORGE G. MOORE.”
“ George G. Moore,
“ 52 Vanderbilt Avenue, “ New…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- State of Colorado v. . HarbeckNew York Court of Appeals · 1921
- Ludlow, Brewerton, & Strong v. Van RensselaerNew York Supreme Court · 1806
3Cited by13 opinions
- Milwaukee County v. M. E. White Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Holcombe v. O'SULLIVANDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1952
- Broward Title Co. v. Jacobs (In Re Apponline.com, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 2002
- Countrywide Home Loans, Inc. v. St. Louis (In Re Apponline.com, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 2003
- Farmers Trust Co. v. BradshawCity of New York Municipal Court · 1930
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.