Legal Opinion

Four Maple Drive Realty Corp. v. Abrams

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 2, 1956PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

On June 9, 1955 the owner of an apartment house filed an application with the local rent administrator at Hempstead, New York, for an adjustment of maximum rents pursuant to section 4 (subd. 4, par. [a], cl. [1]) of the State Residential Rent Law (L. 1946, ch. 274, as amd.) hereinafter called the Rent Law. The landlord asserted that it was entitled to a net 6% return of the assessed valuation of the property, properly adjusted by applying thereto the ratio which such assessed valuation bore to the full valuation as determined by the State Board of Equalization and Assessment. The current…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Schwegmann Bros. v. Calvert Distillers Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
  2. Truax v. CorriganSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  3. Hayes v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  4. Marcus Brown Holding Co. v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  5. Woollcott v. . ShubertNew York Court of Appeals · 1916

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hezekiah v. WilliamsAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1980
  2. In re County of SuffolkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
  3. Opn. No., New York Attorney General Reports1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API