Legal Opinion

Grundmann v. Williams & Peterson

Utah Supreme Court

Decided June 21, 1984No. 19674PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

This is an appeal from an order dismissing both the complaint and the counterclaim pursuant to a motion for such dismissal filed by the plaintiff. The motion was founded on failure of the parties to prosecute the actions alleged in both the complaint and the counterclaim. The matter was resolved after a full hearing, where affidavits and briefs were reviewed in light of the authorities cited.

The trial court has considerable discretion in cases like this.1 The decision in this case is specifically supported by Utah Oil Co. v. Harris, Utah, 565 P.2d 1135 (1977).2 That case enumerates the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Utah Oil Co. v. HarrisUtah Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Wilson v. LambertUtah Supreme Court · 1980
  3. K.L.C. Inc. v. McLeanUtah Supreme Court · 1982

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Country Meadows Convalescent Center v. Utah Department of Health, Division of Health Care FinancingCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API