Legal Opinion · Dissent

Eddington Estate v. Eppert Oil Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 29, 1992No. Docket Nos. 90273, 90274, (Calendar No. 9)Published

1DissentBoyle, J.

I write separately because I disagree that, in every third-party tort action arising out of the injury or death of an employee, either reimbursement is dependent upon the party’s status as a workers’ compensation beneficiary or the entire tort recovery is subject to the employer’s lien without regard to whom and for what the damages are allocated. Because I believe the reimbursement provision of the Workers’ Disability Compensation Act, MCL 418.827(5); MSA 17.237(827X5), is not "clear and unambiguous” and that the nature of the recovery dictates whether the lien attaches, I would hold that…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Montgomery v. StephanMichigan Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Wycko v. GnodtkeMichigan Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Breckon v. Franklin Fuel Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Smith v. City of Detroit SwarthoutMichigan Supreme Court · 1972
  5. United States v. LorenzettiSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API