Spieth v. Stuart
Montana Supreme Court
1Concurring in part, dissenting in part
MR. JUSTICE DAVIS:
(concurring in part and dissenting in part).
I agree that Spieth’s appeal to the district court after the board’s denial of his petition for rehearing brought his claim before that court and within its jurisdiction. But I do not agree with the disposition which the majority makes of the case upon the merits. I would set aside the judgment of the lower court and affirm the board’s order.
My dissents in Levo v. General-Shea-Morrison, 128 Mont. 570, 280 Pac. (2d) 1026; Rathbun v. Taber Tank Lines, Inc., 129 Mont. 121, 283 Pac. (2d) 966, and Gaffney v. Industrial Accident Board,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Montana Horse Products Co. v. Great Northern Railway Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1932
- Continental Supply Co. v. AbellMontana Supreme Court · 1933
- Gaffney v. Industrial Accident Board of MontanaMontana Supreme Court · 1955
- Levo v. General-Shea-MorrisonMontana Supreme Court · 1955
- Rathbun v. Taber Tank Lines, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1955
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.