Legal Opinion
Grunbeck v. Dime Sav. Bank of New York, FSB
District Court, D. New Hampshire
Decided March 24, 1994No. Civ. 93-356-BPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
BARBADORO, District Judge.
Robert and Jennifer Grunbeck seek declaratory and injunctive relief preventing Dime Savings Bank of New York, FSB (“Dime”) from foreclosing on their home in Milford, New Hampshire. The Grunbecks allege that Dime’s security interest in their home is unenforceable because the promissory note it secures authorizes Dime to charge. compound interest in violation of N.H.Rev. Stat.Ann. 397-A:14 (West 1992). Dime presently moves to dismiss the Grunbecks’ suit pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6), arguing, inter alia, that § 501(a) of the Depository Institutions…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Rice v. Santa Fe Elevator Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Morales v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Fidelity Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. De La CuestaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Com., Dept. of Ed. v. First SchoolSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Robert and Jennifer Grunbeck v. The Dime Savings Bank of New York, FsbCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
- Grunbeck v. DimeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
- Grunbeck v. DimeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996