Legal Opinion

Toler v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided April 18, 1900No. 1839PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Ho statement necessary.

1Opinion of the Court

BROOKS, Judge.

Appellant was convicted for playing at a game with cards at a house where spirituous liquors were retailed, and his punishment assessed at a fine of $15.

Hpon the trial, the witnesses being under the rule at the instance of the State, Joe Green, the principal State’s witness, and who had made the complaint, was permitted to testify after defendant had. rested his case. Appellant objected on the ground that Green’s testimony was not in rebuttal. The court, in his sound discretion, can permit the introduction of the testimony of witnesses at any time before the argument closes.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Wright v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1897
  2. Stearnes v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1858
  3. Pilot v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1897
  4. Monticue v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1899

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Stone v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1922
  2. Crawford v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1926
  3. Callison v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1942
  4. Merfett v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1911
  5. Morfett v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1911

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API