Legal Opinion

Niekamp v. United States

District Court, E.D. Missouri

Decided February 18, 1965No. 63C426(2)PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

240 F.Supp. 195 (1965)

George H. NIEKAMP, Plaintiff,

v.

UNITED STATES of America, Defendant.

No. 63C426(2).

United States District Court E. D. Missouri, E. D.

February 18, 1965.

Donald E. Fahey, Don O. Russell and Wm. A. Ens, St. Louis, Mo., for plaintiff.

Richard D. FitzGibbon, Jr., U. S. Atty., John A. Newton, Asst. U. S. Atty., St. Louis, Mo., for defendant.

MEREDITH, District Judge.

This matter was tried to the Court without a jury and the Court makes the following findings of fact and conclusions of law in this memorandum opinion.

This is an action for income tax refund for the years 1956, 1957,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Lang v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1963
  2. Kaufman v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1961
  3. Estate of Leo P. Kaufman, Deceased, Alph C. Kaufman, and Estate of Ida W. Kaufman, Deceased, Alph C. Kaufman v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1962
  4. Otto E. Kuhn and Edna R. Kuhn v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1958
  5. William B. F. Hall, Aileen Hall Shoaff, Arthur F. Hall, Jr., Alva J. McAndless and Fred B. Shoaff, II v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1957

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Laverty v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1973
  2. Burr v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1966
  3. Laverty v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API