Legal Opinion

F. W. Woolworth Co. v. Kinney

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 11, 1929No. 21749PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court.

The parties appear here in the reverse position from that in which they appeared in the courts below.

The plaintiff, Mary A. Kinney, in her petition alleged that while she was a customer and an invitee of the defendant she slipped upon a piece of candy which the defendant had allowed to remain on the floor of its store, and because thereof fell and received injuries.

At the trial, she gave testimony tending to support the allegations of her petition and described the substance as either a piece of candy or chewing gum, of no appreciable thickness and of a diameter of about that of…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Englehardt v. PhilippsOhio Supreme Court · 1939
  2. New York Life Ins. Co. v. SeighmanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1944
  3. Suran v. Lustic Shoe StoreOhio Court of Appeals · 1933
  4. Anaple v. Standard Oil Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Englehardt v. PhilippsOhio Supreme Court · 1939

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API