Legal Opinion

In Re Hynda

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided October 7, 1963PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered

Pee Ctjeiam.

When this matter was originally here, respondent sought to present mitigating facts to us which had not been offered before the Ethics Committee. We indicated that proper procedure calls for such evidence to be presented to the Committee as part of the proceedings before it and remanded the matter to give respondent that opportunity. At the same time we directed his suspension from the practice of law until the further order of the court. 38 N. J. 94 (1962). Further hearings were accordingly held and we have heard additional argument based on…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In Re WilsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1957
  2. In Re DePuySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1952
  3. In Re WagnerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
  4. In Re JamesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
  5. In Re Kafes.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1954

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In Re GurnikSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1965
  2. In Re Van ArsdaleSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1965
  3. In Re WilentzSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1976
  4. Matter of WillisSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API