Legal Opinion
McSweeney v. M.J. Rudolph Corp.
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided December 19, 1983No. CV 78-2003PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
WEXLER, District Judge.
This was an action brought pursuant to the Merchant Marine Act, 46 U.S.C. § 688, commonly known as the “Jones Act”. Plaintiff alleges that plaintiff’s deceased suffered injury and ultimately death as a result of negligence on the part of the defendant and of the third party defendant.
We dismissed defendant and third-party plaintiff M.J. RUDOLPH CORPORATION’S third-party complaint against third-party defendant PENN CENTRAL TRANSPORTATION CO., on the ground that, at trial, sufficient evidence was not presented of negligence on the part of the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Bernard Harney v. William M. Moore Building Corporation and Lopier Construction CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1966
- Pedro Salgado v. M. J. Rudolph Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
3Cited by4 opinions
- Dale v. Luhr Brothers, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1987
- Buccellato v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1992
- Burrle v. International Marine TerminalsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1986
- Dale v. Luhr Brothers, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1987