Legal Opinion

CREDIT ONE BANK, N.A. v. LIEBERMAN

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided April 12, 2022No. 3:21-cv-02923Unknown

1Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY CREDIT ONE BANK, N.A., Petitioner, Civ. No. 21-2923 v. OPINION ADAM LIEBERMAN and GENESE LIEBERMAN, Respondents. THOMPSON, U.S.D.J. INTRODUCTION This matter comes before the Court upon the Motion to Amend/Correct Judgment filed by Credit One Bank, N.A. (“Credit One”). (ECF. No. 13). Adam and Genese Lieberman (collectively, the “Liebermans”) oppose. (ECF No. 16). The Court has decided the Motion based on the written submissions of the parties and without oral argument, pursuant to Local Civil Rule 78.1(b). For the reasons…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Packard-Bamberger & Co., Inc. v. CollierSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2001
  3. Innes Ex Rel. Innes v. Marzano-LesnevichSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2016
  4. Public Interest Research Group of New Jersey, Inc. v. WindallCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
  5. PAUL KAMIENSKI VS. STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEPARTMENTOF TREASURY(L-2106-10, MERCER COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2017

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API