Legal Opinion

Garrett v. Herringdine

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided May 12, 1910No. 2531Published

Action for damages; from city court of Sparta — Judge Moore. February 15, 1910.

1Opinion of the CourtRcwell, J.

In a^civil action for assault and battery it is error to charge the jury as follows: “Under the laws of this State, opprobrious words do not justify an assault and battery, in a civil action by the person injured for damages as a result of such assault and battery.”

2. It is for the jury to say, in a given case brought to recover damages for an assault and battery, whether any opprobrious language that may have been used by plaintiff to the defendant is sufficient to justify the battery, or whether it shall merely mitigate it. Beckworth v. Phillips, 6 Ga. App. 859 (65 S. E. 1075); Thompson v.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Thompson v. ShelvertonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1908
  2. Beckworth v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1909

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API