Legal Opinion
Delgado v. Hakim
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided October 22, 2001PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County *593(Posner, J.), dated September 28, 2000, as denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted by the plaintiff Sonia Delgado on the ground that she did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d).
Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, and the complaint is dismissed insofar as asserted by the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Gaddy v. EylerNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
- Goldin v. LeeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Monaco v. DavenportAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Diaz v. WigginsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Perovich v. LiottaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Claude v. ClementsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Philippe v. IvoryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Lewis v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003