Legal Opinion

Sweeney v. Rozell

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided May 15, 1900PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from a judgment, in favor of the plaintiff, rendered in the Municipal Oourt of the City of New York, eleventh district, borough of Manhattan.

1Per curiam

The plaintiff was in the employ of one Gibson, the proprietor of a sales stable. The defendant sold to Gibson a truck load of hay in bales. It was his custom to send with each truck ropes - and pulleys for the use of the purchaser if he desired to make use of them in stowing the hay in the loft of his stable. Such appliances were sent with the load of hay sold to Gibson and were used for the purpose intended. The hay was rolled into the stable under an opening which led up to the loft. In the upper beam or ridge pole of the stable was a screw bolt, to which was attached a pulley through which…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Devlin v. . SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
  2. Burke v. . WitherbeeNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
  3. Crown v. . OrrNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
  4. Davies v. Pelham Hod Elevating Co.New York Supreme Court · 1892

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Dugan v. American Transfer Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1913
  2. Walsh v. AndersonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API