Legal Opinion

People v. Burts

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 20, 1989PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Case held, decision reserved and matter remitted to Erie County Court for a hearing, in accordance with the following memorandum: The court properly denied defendant’s request for substitution of counsel because defendant did not establish good cause for such relief (see, People v Medina, 44 NY2d 199, 207-209). The evidence was sufficient to support defendant’s conviction under count 2 of the indictment because the victim of the robbery testified that defendant brandished a knife and threatened to kill him prior to stealing his wallet (see, People v Pena, 50 NY2d 400, 408, cert denied 449 US…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. People v. DodtNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. People v. PenaNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  3. People v. HavelkaNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
  4. People v. MalinskyNew York Court of Appeals · 1965
  5. People v. PaytonNew York Court of Appeals · 1980

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. BurtsNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
  2. People v. BurtsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API