Legal Opinion

Bryant v. United States

District Court, D. North Dakota

Decided December 9, 1960No. Cr. 8785PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RONALD N. DAVIES, District Judge.

The matter now before the Court stems from the application of the three petitioners herein, Bryant, Heideman and Kessel, for vacation of their sentences under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. The motions were denied. Bryant, Heideman and Kessel v. United States of America, D.C., 173 F.Supp. 574. Reference to that opinion obviates the necessity for repetitious restatement of background.

Thereafter petitioners appealed to the Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit which, although petitioner Kessel alone in a prior motion brought under Section 2255 claimed coercion in his plea…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. J. Paul Shelton v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1957
  2. Affronti v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1944
  3. Holmes v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1943
  4. United States v. Billie Frield SwaggertyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1955
  5. Johnson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1942

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Stanley v. Kessel, Vance W. Heideman, and George Harding Bryant v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1962
  2. United States v. PetersDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1977
  3. United States v. GriffinUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API