Legal Opinion

Waugh v. Q. & C. Co.

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided October 4, 1926No. 3667PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EYAN A. EYANS, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiffs (appellants herein) brought this suit for an accounting to recover the amount due them for legal services. A brief.statement of the facts which led up to this litigation is necessary to understand the contract, which established plaintiffs! right to compensation and fixed and determined the amount thereof.

About 1902, the railroads of the country began to use antirail creeping devices .in ever-increasing numbers. The growth of the industry was accompanied by the appearance of numerous novel types for which patents were obtained from the government.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Cooper v. BellTennessee Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Brackett v. OstranderAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908
  3. Barnett v. Q. & C. Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1915

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Schrader Byrd & Companion, P.L.L.C. v. MarksWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Lopez v. Muñoz, Hockema & Reed, L.L.P.Texas Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Lopez v. Muñoz, Hockema & Reed, L.L.P.Texas Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Schrader Byrd & Companion, P.L.L.C. v. MarksWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API