Legal Opinion

Brown v. Brown

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 6, 1992No. 92-806PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

DAUKSCH, Judge.

This is an appeal from an order on the former wife/appellee’s motion for contempt. Appellant, the former husband, argues that the order is defective because it lacks an affirmative finding of his present ability to pay. We agree and reverse.

In Bowen v. Bowen, 471 So.2d 1274 (Fla.1985), the Supreme Court of Florida noted:... a present ability to purge is a prerequisite to incarceration for civil con-tempt_ [I]ncarceration cannot be imposed upon a civil contemnor for willfully failing to comply with a court order unless the court first determines that the contemnor has the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bowen v. BowenSupreme Court of Florida · 1985
  2. Broyles v. BroylesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
  3. Scapin v. ScapinDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Langley v. KornegayDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API