Legal Opinion

Cruz v. New York City Housing Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 1, 1993PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Anita Florio, J.), entered August 13, 1992, which, inter alia, denied defendant’s motion for summary judgment, unanimously affirmed, without costs

Plaintiff’s failure to supply the name of a notice witness was inadvertent, and defendant is not prejudiced because it has been given a further opportunity to depose plaintiff. Therefore, there is no need to preclude introduction of the witness’ testimony at trial.

Summary judgment was properly denied since the witness’ affidavit concerning the substance that allegedly caused the plaintiff’s fall created a triable…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Rancano v. Chase Manhattan BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  2. Acevedo v. York International Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API