Legal Opinion

State v. Martin

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided March 20, 1984No. 8328SC857Published

1Opinion of the Court

HILL, Judge.

Defendant first asserts that the trial court erred in not invoking sanctions pursuant to G.S. 15A-910 for the State’s failure to disclose a supplemental F.B.I. handwriting analysis report. Defendant claims that he was prejudiced by the report which identified defendant’s handwriting in connection with a check drawn on the account of another party.

As part of his defense, defendant passed among the jurors an inconclusive fingerprint report prepared by Special Agent Bowers which the State stipulated was valid. Defendant tendered the report into evidence. Defendant says he was not…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Brown v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. State v. CookeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  4. State v. McClainSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  5. State v. JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API