Legal Opinion

V Bar Ranch LLC v. Cotten

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided June 21, 2010No. 09SA191PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Martinez

I. Introduction

Plaintiff-Appellant V Bar Ranch LLC ("V Bar") has a decreed artesian confined-aquifer well that was originally drilled in 1946. At the time of drilling, the well was used to irrigate the Southwest Quarter of Section 3, Township 35 North, Range 9 East, N.M.P.M. ("Section 8"). In 1966, the predecessors in interest to V Bar (hereinafter referred to as "V Bar") began using the well to irrigate the Northwest Quarter of Section 8 in addition to the Southwest Quarter. In 1972, V Bar filed an application for adjudication of the well, and the well was decreed three years later and given…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. City of Thornton v. Bijou Irrigation Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1996
  2. Coffin v. Left Hand Ditch Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1882
  3. Santa Fe Trail Ranches Property Owners Ass'n v. SimpsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1999
  4. Tonko v. MallowSupreme Court of Colorado · 2007
  5. Well Augmentation Subdistrict of Central Colorado Water Conservancy District v. City of AuroraSupreme Court of Colorado · 2009

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Santich v. VCG Holding Corp.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2019
  2. Marks v. GesslerColorado Court of Appeals · 2013
  3. San Antonio v. Special Improvement District No. 1 of Rio Grande Water Conservation DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 2011
  4. Grand Valley Water Users Ass'n v. Busk-Ivanhoe, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2016
  5. Widefield Water & Sanitation District v. WitteSupreme Court of Colorado · 2014

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API