V Bar Ranch LLC v. Cotten
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Martinez
I. Introduction
Plaintiff-Appellant V Bar Ranch LLC ("V Bar") has a decreed artesian confined-aquifer well that was originally drilled in 1946. At the time of drilling, the well was used to irrigate the Southwest Quarter of Section 3, Township 35 North, Range 9 East, N.M.P.M. ("Section 8"). In 1966, the predecessors in interest to V Bar (hereinafter referred to as "V Bar") began using the well to irrigate the Northwest Quarter of Section 8 in addition to the Southwest Quarter. In 1972, V Bar filed an application for adjudication of the well, and the well was decreed three years later and given…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- City of Thornton v. Bijou Irrigation Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1996
- Coffin v. Left Hand Ditch Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1882
- Santa Fe Trail Ranches Property Owners Ass'n v. SimpsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1999
- Tonko v. MallowSupreme Court of Colorado · 2007
- Well Augmentation Subdistrict of Central Colorado Water Conservancy District v. City of AuroraSupreme Court of Colorado · 2009
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Santich v. VCG Holding Corp.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2019
- Marks v. GesslerColorado Court of Appeals · 2013
- San Antonio v. Special Improvement District No. 1 of Rio Grande Water Conservation DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 2011
- Grand Valley Water Users Ass'n v. Busk-Ivanhoe, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2016
- Widefield Water & Sanitation District v. WitteSupreme Court of Colorado · 2014
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.