State v. Unis

ROSENBLUM, S. J.

Defendant, who was convicted of first-degree theft and attempted first-degree theft, argues that the trial court erred in imposing restitution. The judgment of conviction was entered on December 15, 2008, a judgment imposing $851.15 in restitution was entered on February 3, 2009, and ultimately, the court determined the proper amount of restitution to be imposed — $2,570.13—on August 31, 2009, and later entered an amended judgment to that effect. Defendant asserts that the court erred in determing that there was “good cause” to impose restitution beyond the 90-day time-line…