Legal Opinion
Nomos Corp. v. ZMED, INC.
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided October 9, 2001No. 01-CV-10765-MELPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
LASKER, District Judge.
ZMED has filed a counter-claim for infringement of patent no. 5,447,154 (’154). The patent is owned by the Universite Joseph Fourier (UJF), a French educational body, which licensed the patent to Praxim, which in turn licensed it to ZMED. NOMOS moves to dismiss ZMED’s counter-claim on the ground that ZMED lacks standing to sue.
The motion is denied.
/.
On May 4, 2001, NOMOS Corporation (NOMOS) filed its complaint for infringement of its patent no. 5,411,026 by defendant ZMED, Inc. (ZMED). On July 19, 2001, ZMED filed its counter-claim upon NOMOS for…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Waterman v. MacKenzieSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Vaupel Textilmaschinen Kg and Vaupel North America v. Meccanica Euro Italia S.P.A. And American Trim Products, Inc., Defendants/cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
- Prima Tek II, L.L.C. v. A-Roo Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
- Intellectual Property Development, Inc. v. Tci Cablevision of California, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- Pope Manufacturing Co. v. Gormully & Jeffery Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1892
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Great Lakes Intellectual Property Ltd. v. Sakar International, Inc.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 2007