Legal Opinion

Kutina v. Combs

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 29, 1930No. 27,920PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Olsen, C.

Appeal by defendant Jake Eeigel, hereinafter referred to as the defendant, from an order denying his motion for a new trial.

The action is one to recover the purchase price of goods sold and delivered. The claim of the plaintiff in substance is that she sold the goods to defendant; that credit was extended to him; that there was an original promise on his part to pay for them; that she was directed to deliver the goods to Henry Combs, Sr. and did so deliver them. The case was tried to the court without a jury, and the court found in favor of the plaintiff and directed judgment…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Falkenstein v. BraufmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API