Legal Opinion

Patterson v. Hendrix

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided December 21, 1883PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

1. Where a case was argued during the term of court, and a consent order was taken, allowing the presiding judge to decide the same in chambers within thirty days from the date of +ho order, time was of the essence of the consent, and a judgment rendered in chambers after the time allowed had expired was coram non judice and void, and on exception will be reversed. Code, §249 ; 60 Ga., 123; 55 Id., 258 ; 59 Id., 628.

2. Two distinct persons having no privity of any sort between them, except that both had failed to obey a summons todo road duty, and had been tried therefor by the commissioners’…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Tison v. MyrickSupreme Court of Georgia · 1878

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Odum & Cochran v. Macon & Birmingham Railway Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  2. Haralson County v. PittmanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
  3. RobinsonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1917
  4. Shouse v. GoberCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1933
  5. Ambos v. ChastainCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1947

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API