In re the Grade Crossing Commissioners
New York Supreme Court
Motion to confirm report of commissioners of award.
1Opinion of the CourtPound, J.
Certain of the jirojJerty owners affected by this proceeding object to the confirmation of the report on the following grounds:
First, that the award of. taxes to the city or county was erroneous, uncertain and indefinite. The taxes proved amount to ten dollars and thirty-six cents against parcel Ho. 2, nothing against the other parcels represented by the obj eetors. The obj ect-ion is not substantial. The amount of taxes was properly proved. The taxes which were a lien on the land at the time the damage was done are a lien upon the award and should he deducted therefrom. Subsequent taims were…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Merritt v. . Village of PortchesterNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
- Matter of N.Y.C. H.R.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1876
- Matter of BakerNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
- In re the Grade Crossing CommissionersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900
3Cited by3 opinions
- In re the Grade Crossing CommissionersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1911
- County of Orange v. Storm King Stone Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1920
- In re Board of Supervisors of Sullivan County, New York County Courts1933