Brooklyn Union Gas Co. v. New York State Human Rights Appeal Board
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtJones, J.
We hold that the provisions of subdivision 3 of section 205 of our State’s Disability Benefits Law do not operate to shelter employment practices in the private sector *86that would otherwise be impermissibly discriminatory under our Human Rights Law. The imperative of the latter overrides the permissiveness of the former.
We have held that an employment personnel policy which singles out pregnancy and childbirth for treatment different from that accorded other instances of physical or medical impairment or disability is prohibited by the Human Rights Law (Union Free School Dist. No. 6, Towns of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- General Electric Co. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Union Free School District No. 6 v. New York State Human Rights Appeal BoardNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
- Engle v. TalaricoNew York Court of Appeals · 1973
- Board of Education of Union Free School District No. 2 v. New York State Division of Human RightsNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
- Board of Education v. State Division of Human RightsNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Reid v. StuartWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1878