Legal Opinion

Weatherington v. Georgia Southern & Florida Railway Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 4, 1916No. 6354PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Action for damages; from city court of Tifton — Judge R. Eve. February 3, 1915.

1Opinion of the CourtRussell, C. J.

1. “-Ordinary domestic animals may, in this State, generally, range upon the right of way of a railroad company or other uninclosed lands. They therefore can not be regarded as trespassers upon the track of a railroad company.” Georgia Railroad Co. v. Churchill, 113 Ga. 12 (38 S. E. 336). A fortiori, such animals ranging upon that portion of the right of way not occupied by the tracks can not be considered as trespassers. Consequently, where the death of a domestic animal is due to the negligence of a railroad company in maintaining upon its right of way an unprotected open well, the owner of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Georgia Railroad & Banking Co. v. ChurchillSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
  2. Nelson v. Central Railroad & Banking Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1873
  3. Seaboard Air-Line Railway v. ParrishCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1915
  4. Garner v. Town of East PointCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1910
  5. Seaboard Air-Line Railway v. ParishCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1915

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. McKenzie v. PowellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1942
  2. Powell v. NelsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936
  3. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. WillisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1931
  4. Atlanta, Birmingham & Coast Railroad v. PattersonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API