California Shock Trauma Air Rescue v. State Compensation Insurance Fund
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WALLACE, Senior Circuit Judge:
These consolidated appeals arise from two separate actions that involve California Shock Trauma Air Rescue (CALSTAR). Both actions turn on the same jurisdictional question: is the expectation of a federal defense, without more, sufficient to establish federal jurisdiction over a state-law claim? Despite CALSTAR’s arguments to the contrary, we reiterate that the well-pleaded complaint rule precludes the exercise of federal subject matter jurisdiction over purely state-law causes of action, like the one raised here.
I
CALSTAR provides air-ambulance rescue…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Gully v. First Nat. Bank in MeridianSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Grable & Sons Metal Products, Inc. v. Darue Engineering & ManufacturingSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- Firstenberg v. City of Santa FeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
- Treasurer of New Jersey v. United States Department of the TreasuryCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2012
- Jackie Saldana v. Glenhaven Healthcare LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022
- Getz v. Boeing Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Newtok Village v. Andy PatrickCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.