Legal Opinion

California Shock Trauma Air Rescue v. State Compensation Insurance Fund

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 31, 2011No. Nos. 09-16810, 09-16874PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WALLACE, Senior Circuit Judge:

These consolidated appeals arise from two separate actions that involve California Shock Trauma Air Rescue (CALSTAR). Both actions turn on the same jurisdictional question: is the expectation of a federal defense, without more, sufficient to establish federal jurisdiction over a state-law claim? Despite CALSTAR’s arguments to the contrary, we reiterate that the well-pleaded complaint rule precludes the exercise of federal subject matter jurisdiction over purely state-law causes of action, like the one raised here.

I

CALSTAR provides air-ambulance rescue…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  2. Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Gully v. First Nat. Bank in MeridianSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  5. Grable & Sons Metal Products, Inc. v. Darue Engineering & ManufacturingSupreme Court of the United States · 2005

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Firstenberg v. City of Santa FeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
  2. Treasurer of New Jersey v. United States Department of the TreasuryCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2012
  3. Jackie Saldana v. Glenhaven Healthcare LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022
  4. Getz v. Boeing Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  5. Newtok Village v. Andy PatrickCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API