Legal Opinion
ARUNA
Board of Immigration Appeals
Decided July 1, 2008No. ID 3600PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Cite as
24 I&N Dec. 452
(BIA 2008) Interim Decision #3600 Matter of Lamin ARUNA, Respondent File A44 754 412 - Baltimore Decided February 26, 2008 U.S. Department of Justice Executive Office for Immigration Review Board of Immigration Appeals Absent controlling precedent to the contrary, a State law misdemeanor offense of conspiracy to distribute marijuana qualifies as an “aggravated felony” under section 101(a)(43)(B) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(43)(B) (2000), where its elements correspond to the elements of the Federal felony offense of conspiracy to distribute…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Shepard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- United States v. ShabaniSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Lopez v. GonzalesSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Moncrieffe v. HolderSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Evanson v. Attorney General of United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
- CUELLARBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2012
- CASTRO RODRIGUEZBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2012
- Adrian Moncrieffe v. Eric Holder, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2011
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.