Legal Opinion

State v. Minez

Montana Supreme Court

Decided May 4, 2004No. 02-069PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Rice

¶1 Cory Minez (Minez) was charged by information with the offenses of criminal production or manufacture of dangerous drugs, criminal possession of dangerous drugs, and possession or use of property subject to criminal forfeiture. The District Court for the Twentieth Judicial District, Lake County, denied Minez’s motion to suppress certain evidence. Following trial by jury, Minez was found guilty of all counts except possession or use of property subject to criminal forfeiture. Minez appeals. We affirm.

¶2 The following issues are raised on appeal:

¶3 1. Did the District Court improperly deny…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. State v. TackittMontana Supreme Court · 2003
  3. State v. LongMontana Supreme Court · 1985
  4. State v. WorrallMontana Supreme Court · 1999
  5. State v. HuertaMontana Supreme Court · 1997

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State v. CliffordMontana Supreme Court · 2005
  2. State v. DethmanMontana Supreme Court · 2010
  3. State v. C. ChristensenMontana Supreme Court · 2020
  4. State v. TorgersonMontana Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Carolyn McCormack v. Andrea AndresMontana Supreme Court · 2008

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API