Paul v. Long Island Lighting Co.

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Phelan, J.), entered June 25, 2002, which denied their motion, *261denominated as one for leave to reargue and renew, but which was, in effect, for leave to renew.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

A motion for leave to renew should be denied unless the moving party offers a reasonable justification as to why the new facts were not submitted on the prior motion (see CPLR 2221 [e]; Palmer v Toledo, 266 AD2d 268 [1999]). The plaintiffs failed to offer a…