Herf and Dittmar v. James
Texas Supreme Court
Application for Mandamus to compel the Court of Civil Appeals for Fourth District to certify a dissent to the Supreme Court, to the end: that the Supreme Court take jurisdiction of the case. The appeal is from Bexar County.
1Opinion of the Court
STAYTON, Chief Justice.
Plaintiffs make application for writ of mandamus to compel the judges of the Court of Civil Appeals for the, Fourth Supreme Judicial District to certify to this court for decision a case in which there was dissent as to the qualification of one of the judges of that court.
Before parties will be cited to show cause why such relief should notj be granted, the petition will be looked to, in order to ascertain whether it states a cause in which this court has jurisdiction, either original or appellate.
The petition in this case simply shows that plaintiff recovered a…
2Cited by18 opinions
- Wallis, Landes & Co. v. StuartTexas Supreme Court · 1899
- Simpson v. McDonaldTexas Supreme Court · 1944
- Perry v. GreerTexas Supreme Court · 1920
- Kidd v. Rainey, Chief JusticeTexas Supreme Court · 1902
- Missouri, K. & T. Ry. Co. v. LovellTexas Supreme Court · 1920
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.