Legal Opinion
Newman v. Guaranty Trust Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided January 15, 1935PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order denying motion to dismiss complaint for insufficiency affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. An action for money had and received, while one at law, is governed by equitable principles. (Schank v. Schuchman, 212 N. Y. 352; Chapman v. Forbes, 123 id. 532; Presser v. Central Trust & Savings Co., 189 App. Div. 721; Commercial National Bank v. Sloman, 121 id. 874; Rathbone v. Stocking, 2 Barb. 135; Eddy v. Smith, 13 Wend. 488; Wright v. Butler, 6 id. 284; Claflin v. Godfrey, 21 Pick. [Mass.] 1, 6.) A rescission acted upon is governed by the same principles which control an…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Schank v. . SchuchmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1914
- Eddy v. SmithNew York Supreme Court · 1835
- Rathbone v. StockingNew York Supreme Court · 1848
- Inman v. Credit Discount Corp. of AmericaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930
- Presser v. Central Trust & Savings Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1919
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Waldman Produce, Inc. v. Frigidaire Corp.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1935
- Schwartz v. DicksteinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
- Forrest v. FuchsNew York Supreme Court · 1984
- Bennett v. PiscitelloRochester City Court · 1938