Zweifel v. Harrisburg Railways Co.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Me. Chief Justice Moschzisker,
Mary Zweifel sued in trespass to recover for the death of her husband, which she alleged was due to the negligence of the Harrisburg Railways Company; judgment was entered on a verdict in her favor and defendant has appealed.
The action arose out of a right-angled collision between an automobile driven by Thomas Zweifel, plaintiff’s husband, and a trolley car of defendant company. On the morning of July 19, 1922, Zweifel was driving his machine, a coupe, at ordinary speed, east on Woodbine Street, and defendant’s car was going nOrth on Fourth Strefet;…
2Cited by2 opinions
- Seckinger v. Economy Laundry, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
- Shields v. NeffSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938