Legal Opinion
3V, INC. v. CIBA Specialty Chemicals Corp.
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided November 20, 2008No. Civil Action 06-593-JJF, 06-629-JJF, 06-672-JJFPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FARNAN, District Judge.
Presently before the Court is 3V’s Motion to Dismiss Civil Action Nos. 06-00593-JJF, 06-00629-JJF, and 06-00672-JJF for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. (D.I. 34 in 06-00593-JJF.) 1 Also before the Court is CIBA’s Motion For Leave Of Court To Serve Limited Discovery Relating To 3V’s Disclaimer Of Its Patent Claims. (D.I. 37.) For the reasons discussed, the Court will grant 3V’s Motion to Dismiss and deny CIBA’s Motion For Leave of Court To Serve Limited Discovery.
1. Factual Background
This dispute stems from Interference No. 105,262, initiated by the Board of…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Flast v. CohenSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- MedImmune, Inc. v. Genentech, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Mortensen v. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
- Richard Weiss, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Regal Collections Lancer Investments, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
- Prasco, LLC v. Medicis Pharmaceutical Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Idenix Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Gilead Sciences, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2016
- Pro-Football, Inc. v. BlackhorseDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2014